<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Up, More Of The Same</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/2008/08/15/next-up-more-of-the-same-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/2008/08/15/next-up-more-of-the-same-2/</link>
	<description>Rants about hockey (chiefly the Carolina Hurricanes) from an Adopted Southerner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:48:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doogie2K</title>
		<link>http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/2008/08/15/next-up-more-of-the-same-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4585</link>
		<dc:creator>Doogie2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/?p=599#comment-4585</guid>
		<description>As I stated a few threads down, I see why the SE takes the shit that it does for the on-ice product, but I don&#039;t agree that it&#039;s a reflection on the hockey markets so much as the hockey people: either they&#039;ve fucked up or they&#039;ve had horrible luck.  However you choose to look at it, contracting a team because it sucks is not the right move.  If a team is winning like it&#039;s going out of style &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; playing before an arena with as much excitement as the pre-2007 United Center, then we can talk about movement, but the closest we&#039;ve come to that scenario in recent years is Nashville, and again, that team has not won a playoff round yet in its existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I stated a few threads down, I see why the SE takes the shit that it does for the on-ice product, but I don&#8217;t agree that it&#8217;s a reflection on the hockey markets so much as the hockey people: either they&#8217;ve fucked up or they&#8217;ve had horrible luck.  However you choose to look at it, contracting a team because it sucks is not the right move.  If a team is winning like it&#8217;s going out of style <i>and</i> playing before an arena with as much excitement as the pre-2007 United Center, then we can talk about movement, but the closest we&#8217;ve come to that scenario in recent years is Nashville, and again, that team has not won a playoff round yet in its existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canes Country &#187; Versus- One and Done for Carolina</title>
		<link>http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/2008/08/15/next-up-more-of-the-same-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4584</link>
		<dc:creator>Canes Country &#187; Versus- One and Done for Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/?p=599#comment-4584</guid>
		<description>[...] but not least, one of my fellow Hurricanes Bloggers felt the need to call me out because of my &#8220;crying&#8221; concerning Drew Mindell&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but not least, one of my fellow Hurricanes Bloggers felt the need to call me out because of my &#8220;crying&#8221; concerning Drew Mindell&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Acid Queen</title>
		<link>http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/2008/08/15/next-up-more-of-the-same-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4583</link>
		<dc:creator>The Acid Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/?p=599#comment-4583</guid>
		<description>And when that same editor goes home (assuming of course that he bothers to show), I am willing to bet that he&#039;ll repay your hospitality by taking more potshots. Maybe you&#039;ll get some free Yahoo Sports kit in the bargain.

Cynical?  Yes. But my cynicism is borne of long years of experience.

Thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And when that same editor goes home (assuming of course that he bothers to show), I am willing to bet that he&#8217;ll repay your hospitality by taking more potshots. Maybe you&#8217;ll get some free Yahoo Sports kit in the bargain.</p>
<p>Cynical?  Yes. But my cynicism is borne of long years of experience.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/2008/08/15/next-up-more-of-the-same-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acidqueen.projectremains.com/?p=599#comment-4582</guid>
		<description>Actually, it was a different toolbag who interviewed DeCock, but same site.  

We had a pretty good discussion going on, despite the &quot;crying&quot;.  (68 comments and climbing)  Plus the &quot;editor&quot; toolbag in question has agreed to come to a game and party with us.  Maybe some good will come out of this afterall.  *S*  Sorry you don&#039;t approve.  

Some of us can choose to sit back and roll our eyes, or some of us can choose to call out a cheap shot when it&#039;s a cheap shot.  To each our own.  *shrugs*

I&#039;m surprised you bother read our site anyway, considering that we haven&#039;t been on your blogroll in awhile now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it was a different toolbag who interviewed DeCock, but same site.  </p>
<p>We had a pretty good discussion going on, despite the &#8220;crying&#8221;.  (68 comments and climbing)  Plus the &#8220;editor&#8221; toolbag in question has agreed to come to a game and party with us.  Maybe some good will come out of this afterall.  *S*  Sorry you don&#8217;t approve.  </p>
<p>Some of us can choose to sit back and roll our eyes, or some of us can choose to call out a cheap shot when it&#8217;s a cheap shot.  To each our own.  *shrugs*</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised you bother read our site anyway, considering that we haven&#8217;t been on your blogroll in awhile now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
